Talk:IJustine/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Hi! I'll be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have the full review up shortly. Dana boomer (talk) 01:41, 10 January 2009 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * In the I-phone bill section, the last sentence seems out of place. I'm not sure what the phone automatically updating had to do with e-billing, which is what is being discussed in the previous sentence.  Can you clarify...
 * How is it now?--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 04:57, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * In the last picture of the article, the caption is "Ezarik wears new glasses at Podcamp AZ (2008-11-02)" Are these part of the new equipment provided by AT&T?  If so, could you clarify this in the caption, because as it stands it makes it sound like the article believes it's notable that she got new eyeglasses...
 * It is just a different perspective of her with glasses.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 04:57, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Please make sure that all of the references are formatted the same. Most currently use templates, but there are a couple that don't.
 * I found 3.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 05:10, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * There are a couple of prose issues that I would like to see fixed before I promote the article, but overall a very nice job! Let me know if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 02:04, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Everything looks good now, so I'm going to pass the article to GA status. Nice work, and thanks for the prompt response. Dana boomer (talk) 18:10, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * There are a couple of prose issues that I would like to see fixed before I promote the article, but overall a very nice job! Let me know if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 02:04, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Everything looks good now, so I'm going to pass the article to GA status. Nice work, and thanks for the prompt response. Dana boomer (talk) 18:10, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Everything looks good now, so I'm going to pass the article to GA status. Nice work, and thanks for the prompt response. Dana boomer (talk) 18:10, 10 January 2009 (UTC)