Talk:IMac G4

Untitled
Sorry, i removed this G4 computer from the category:Industrial design examples

This computer was not successful enough.

Stef
 * First off, this computer was not successful enough, according to whom? Secondly since when is product that sells well a prerequisite for an industrial design example? I'm sure you meant no harm (actually I'm just being polite, I'm sure you did, but it is OK, I forgive you) but please do not remove something from a category due to only personal POVTrevorLSciAct 02:51, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The burden of providing sources should be upon those who think it should be placed in the category. Where is your source? Otherwise claiming it to be an industry design example is personal POV. Mdwh (talk) 02:59, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * No comment, so I'm removing. It occurs to me though that this entire category is a POV magnet - by what criterion is something added to this category? Mdwh (talk) 02:58, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Not really important for this article but in case you run into this again, I think one non POV test could be RS that show a product has been used in university level curriculum on industrial design. Czarking0 (talk) 15:31, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

RAM in this
The RAM is in fact in two separate parts. One is under the motherboard and the other is actually on the motherboard.Fletcherbrian (talk) 15:39, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Do you want to add this fact to the article? If so you can do it yourself &#34;MonkeyWithGlasses44&#34; (talk) 16:04, 26 September 2014 (UTC)