Talk:IMac G4/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Nominator: 18:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Vacant0 (talk · contribs) 16:14, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello! I'll be reviewing this article as part of the ongoing GAN backlog drive. -- Vacant 0 (talk &bull; contribs) 16:14, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Initial comments

 * There is unlikely any copyright violation in the article. Earwig's Copyvio Detector has reported only 20.6% in similarity.
 * There are no cleanup banners, such as those listed at WP:QF, in the article.
 * The article is stable.
 * No previous GA reviews.

General comments

 * Prose, spelling, and grammar checking.
 * No issues were found in the lede.
 * "15 inch, 17 inch, and 20 inch..." → 15-inch, 17-inch, and 20-inch...
 * There is a missing space at the beginning of the second sentence in the last paragraph of the "Release" section.
 * The rest of the article looks good. I did not find any grammar errors.
 * Checking whether the article complies with MOS.
 * Optional: Add alt texts to the images in the article.
 * Optional: I feel like the Specifications section should be somewhere more up in the article. Reception and legacy should be at the bottom.
 * The article complies with the MOS:LEDE, MOS:LAYOUT, and MOS:WTW guidelines. There is no fiction and embedded lists within the article, so I am skipping MOS:WAF and MOS:EMBED.
 * Checking refs, verifiability, and whether there is original research.
 * References section with a reflist template is present in the article.
 * No referencing issues.
 * Listed references are reliable. Good job on archiving refs.
 * Spotchecked Ref 8, 9, 13, 23, 42, 47, 54, 67, 70–all verify the cited content. AGF on other citations.
 * Optional: Fix the order of references in the text. "[50][38][11]" → "[11][38][50]"
 * Copyvio already checked.
 * Checking whether the article is broad in its coverage.
 * I always like reading articles like this.
 * "although it can also boot into OS 9" Ref 9 mentions the reason, in order to access older Mac software. I feel like this could be added.
 * The article addresses the main aspects, and it stays focused on the topic.
 * Checking whether the article is presented from an NPOV standpoint.
 * The article meets the criteria and is written in encyclopedic language.
 * Checking whether the article is stable.
 * As noted in the initial comments, the article has been stable.
 * Checking images.
 * All looks good.

Final comments
Overall, a very good article. There are a couple of things to fix. Once this gets addressed, I'll promote the article. The review will be on hold for a week. -- Vacant 0 (talk &bull; contribs) 13:59, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Hey Vacant0, thanks for the review. I believe I've addressed all of the above except the comment about the specifications; at the end is where the wikiproject puts them. I'm not opposed to a different place for it, but I think that's a conversation beyond the scope of this GAN, as it would impact a lot of good and featured content (e.g. Power Mac G4 Cube, PowerBook 100.) Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs  talk 19:24, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Okay, good to know. Promoting. -- Vacant 0 (talk &bull; contribs) 21:57, 6 July 2024 (UTC)