Talk:IND Culver Line/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Coemgenus (talk · contribs) 13:30, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

I'll review this one over the next few days. --Coemgenus (talk) 13:30, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for taking this review up.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 17:19, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Checklist

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments

 * Images
 * There are almost too many, but I think it works. Any more and you'd crowd out the text. The one I'd move is File:Bmt_triplex_no_5.png, which brackets the text in conjunction with File:Culverstub.JPG in that section. Stacking them would solve the problem.
 * Everything about licensing seems to be in order.


 * Extent and service
 * "However, there has been no express service on the Culver Line since 1987. Express service has only operated once on the line from 1968 to 1987." These sentences say much the same thing, and could probably be combined and shortened.


 * Automated equipment
 * I would spell out "Communications-based train control" the first time it's mentioned.


 * IND Brooklyn Line (1933–1954)
 * I made some minor copyedits, please revert if I've changed the meaning of sentences improperly.
 * Everything else looks good so far. I'll do a second pass while you work on these. --Coemgenus (talk) 18:40, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I have dealt with all of these.--Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 18:53, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I think that's everything. Nice article! I'll promote it right away. --Coemgenus (talk) 12:01, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much! --Kew Gardens 613 (talk) 00:46, 14 May 2017 (UTC)