Talk:INS Arihant/Archive 1

file:INS Arihant.png
file:INS Arihant.png has been nominated for deletion -- 65.94.79.6 (talk) 04:10, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

New info (Jan 2014)

 * N-missile sub to start sea trials within weeks
 * Get ready to deploy underwater N-deterrent
 * With first nuclear submarine INS Arihant set for sea trials, Navy wants more for strategic deterrence
 * Fully armed Arihant to hit the sea in a month
 * N-sub Arihant ready for trial in a few weeks

For future use. Anir1uph &#124; talk &#124; contrib 22:36, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page
Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:


 * http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/arihant-class/
 * Triggered by  on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.— cyberbot II NotifyOnline 12:31, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

✅ This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.— cyberbot II NotifyOnline 21:51, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

80 MWe or MWt? Electric or thermal power output
Many news reports on Arihant only refer to the reactor as capable of 80 MW but do not bother mentioning if MW they are referring to is thermal or electric. Naval Nuclear reactors have about 20% thermal efficiency so if the reactor is capable of 80 MW-thermal then it is only capable of 15 MW-electrical. It is not known clearly if the the reactor is '80 MWe(around 400 MWt)' or '80 MWt'.

I suggest marking the reactor's power as disputed till a more reliable source is found. standardengineer (talk) 13:09, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 one external links on INS Arihant. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090729212011/http://www.hindu.com:80/thehindu/holnus/000200907261621.htm to http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/holnus/000200907261621.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110717071224/http://www.pib.nic.in/release/phsmall.asp?phid=23703 to http://pib.nic.in/release/phsmall.asp?phid=23703

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 17:04, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 one external links on INS Arihant. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090808043941/http://www.hindu.com:80/2009/08/03/stories/2009080353810100.htm to http://www.hindu.com/2009/08/03/stories/2009080353810100.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090804105946/http://pib.nic.in:80/release/phsmall.asp?phid=23704 to http://pib.nic.in/release/phsmall.asp?phid=23704
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090905085745/http://www.defpro.com:80/daily/details/364 to http://www.defpro.com/daily/details/364/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 19:58, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Claims of misleading news
, your claims of misleading news are unsupported by the refs that you have provided. The Hindu news report was corroborated by The Print, and the ref that you provided for the news being false is an opinion piece by a non-expert. You addition is also full of original research, as you have made multiple claims that are unsupported by the refs. You called The Hindu news report "sensational", but you cannot call it that unless a reliable source does it too. You cannot claim that "news went viral on social media and was picked up by several international publications", without a reliable source for this explicit claim. Providing references of other news articles reporting on this is not sufficient for it "going viral". Finally, you claimed that the news report was "debunked by other new [sic] agencies", but all you've provided is a single opinion piece by a non-expert. This doesn't even come close to being sufficient for a claim of this magnitude. If the author was an expert, his opinion could have been mentioned alongside as per WP:DUE, but since he is an editor of a publication that is not even considered to be a reliable source here, it does not warrant a mention. —Gazoth (talk) 20:17, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Gazoth, All of these can be said about The Hindu's article as well. It is an opinion piece written by random editors WITHOUT citing a source. If you are so keen about this, then why did you insert that opinion piece into this article? That article itself doesn't cite a single verifiable source. Dsvz (talk) 14:13, 7 March 2019 (UTC)Dsvz
 * , I don't think you have a basic understanding of how reporting works. Original reporting does not need to cite sources, since the reporters communicate with the sources directly to collect their information. The contents of original reporting is considered to be factual, as long as the publication is reliable. This contrasts with an opinion piece, where an author expresses a personal opinion. The The Hindu and The Print are reliable sources and news reports from them are considered to be factual. What you have cited is clearly an opinion piece, as evidenced by the disclaimer at the bottom The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of www.economictimes.com. You still haven't addressed any of the concerns of original research, and are repeatedly restoring your version without addressing any of the concerns expressed on the talk page. —Gazoth (talk) 15:05, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Regarding Image
Hey, You recently add an image of INS Arihant. Unfortunately clarity of image is challenging. As I can see the image is taken from another image. Can you please replace it? Brown Chocolate (talk) 15:50, 4 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Yes, this image is cropped from [this] image of PM Modi announcing the first deterrent patrol. Unfortunately, this is the BEST anyone can do. There is no clear picture of the poster of Arihant behind the back of PM Modi. Vaibhavafro (talk) 02:15, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Instead of appreciating the my ingenuity, you are complaining about picture quality. I dare you; if you can upload a more clear picture of Arihant to Wikimedia, do it.- Vaibhavafro Talk  06:31, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

, I am extremely sorry if you felt that I was complaining. I really appreciate your work. What happened was, I google images of Arihant and found few. Then I thought to have talk with you for uploading better image cuz I really don't know about licensing therefore I left that massage on this talk page and ask to replace it. But later I realised non of them were real. Only best thing could be done was already done by you. I am again sorry. I hope you understand, Please be a friend to me. Please forgive me. Brown Chocolate (talk) 08:35, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
 * I am a friend to you; no need to be sorry. This image is one of the ONLY SIX available visuals of Arihant. The other five visuals are [this], [this], [this] and [one small footage by a Orissa news channel I saw on YouTube]. This is the best anyone can do. Good regards, Vaibhavafro  Talk  14:14, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for understanding and thanks for your great work. Brown Chocolate (talk) 14:52, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:54, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
 * INS Arihant during sea trials .jpg