Talk:IOS/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 18:55, 14 January 2018 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

I will give you the benefit of the doubt and not quick fail this nomination. There are several sentences that have no citations/references. Some quick examples that I found:


 * "Since iOS 3.2, users are able to set a background image for the Home screen. This feature is only available on third-generation devices—iPhone 3GS, third-generation iPod touch (iOS 4.0 or newer), all iPad models (since iOS 3.2)—or newer."


 * Most of the "Notification Center" sub-section.


 * Second paragraph in the "Digital rights management" sub-section.

I will place this nomination on hold for a couple days to allow you to find reliable sources for the sentences that are missing references. Afterwords I will continue with a full review.-- Dom497 ( talk ) 18:55, 14 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Failing nomination since there has been no activity on this review and the article still has some ways to go before being properly ready for a nomination.-- Dom497 ( talk ) 14:13, 20 January 2018 (UTC)