Talk:IOS 6

Infobox Type
Should this article have the OS version infobox instead of the OS infobox it currently has? Alphius (talk) 13:54, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

✅ –– 76.10.241.86 (talk) 20:42, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Bugs
Is this bug on topic for iOS 6? Guardian is one of many tech news outlets that have talked about it. --Kushal (talk) 18:03, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Battery life and Wi-Fi issues with iOS 6 not mentioned
Why not? I'm still on 5.1.1 and I know about them - shockingly short battery life and not connecting to Wi-Fi networks is what I have read about. --86.156.190.100 (talk) 23:15, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, if you're read about them from a reliable source you can certainly add them. Just stick the source in brackets like . You can get fancier, but that's like the minimum. Nobody Ent 23:48, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

New version of iOS 6?
I was checking my iPhone 5 for updates today, that they released iOs 6.0.2 today. it's that official? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.255.121.129 (talk) 04:01, 19 December 2012 (UTC)


 * According to iOS version history (and now this article – I updated it), iOS 6.0.2 was released only for the iPhone 5 and iPad Mini as a WiFi bug fix.  The Anonymouse ( talk  •  contribs ) [ Merry Christmas! ] 06:09, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Transclusion of table!
Table should to be 'transcluded' into this page from the main iOS version history page – this is VERY important as it helps significantly by stoping double editing and many errors creeping in across both pages continually, and they then don't both have to be checked through continually for inaccuracies.

I don't know how to set this up?? Anyone? Jimthing (talk) 05:55, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅ The Anonymouse (talk) 16:51, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Good article status
Hi everybody.

I am considering nominating this article for good article status, but before I do so, I want to ask everyone first if they are noticing anything that should be changed, added, or removed? I appreciate any and all feedback, as I haven't nominated an article before, and although I think the article complies with the six criterias for good articles, I would like someone else than myself to take a look first to see if there is anything particular that should be changed. Thanks. LocalNet (talk) 13:29, 4 February 2017 (UTC)