Talk:IPad (3rd generation)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Czarkoff (talk · contribs) 16:02, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Status
''This section is supposed to be edited only by reviewer(s). Any questions and comments concerning this table should be posed in Discussion subsection below.''

Discussion
''Please refer to issue by numbers. Eg., the second issue with 1a criterion is 1a2.''
 * 1b1:For the record: this solution isn't the best one IMHO, but this way the ambiguity is solved. Though MOS demands abbreviations spelled in full on first occurrence, this one seems to be known widely enough. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 01:54, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
 * 1a4: I have reworded the phrase and removed the word overheating as I believe that word made the sentence a bit awkward to read even if the suggestions were to be substituted in - feel free to use the suggestions but it just sounds a bit weird to my ear. YuMaNuMa Contrib 11:08, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
 * My suggestion was worse then the new text. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 08:41, 1 April 2012 (UTC)


 * 2b: The citation needed tag in the infobox has been addressed. YuMaNuMa Contrib 11:20, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Not actually. The sound capabilities of iPad are an important aspect. There were speculations on changes before the release and some sources claim sound-related improvements, sometimes contradicting each other. Definitely this topic should get coverage. Furthermore, I would expect the hardware capabilities of the device (eg. hardware audio and video encoding/decoding) covered, though in case of iPad it may be not as critical as in cases of Android tablets. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 08:41, 1 April 2012 (UTC)