Talk:IRT Powerhouse/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 01:42, 11 March 2021 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * The only issues were a word here or there and a couple of commas, but nothing serious.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * A content mill is the only major similarity in content; the 1979 LPC report has slightly higher similarity due to several organization names and at least one book title, but from there, there are no serious copyvio concerns. Spot checks in areas with online sources reveal no close paraphrasing issues.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * The article has logical organization and covers the building's architectural, technical and historic dimensions cleanly. The article's focus on the building helps a lot in avoiding focus issues.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Article has no neutrality issues and generally covers uncontroversial ground. There is good balance where differing points of view are presented.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Mostly minor correction edits since expansion.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Images are all freely licensed or have had copyright lapse (the older illustration and photo). One is used in the infobox, and the others are used to illustrate specific areas of the article with accompanying captions.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Hard to ask much more of the page besides the missing word and comma fixes which I supplied. This article passes. Sammi Brie  (she/her • t • c) 02:26, 11 March 2021 (UTC)