Talk:ISLISP

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on ISLISP. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070311082235/http://anubis.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC22/WG16/open/tisl.html to http://anubis.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC22/WG16/open/tisl.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060829025242/http://cube.misto.cz/lisp/ to http://cube.misto.cz/lisp/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:32, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Timeline
In the "Timeline of Lisp dialects", ISLisp starts between 1985 and 1989. This is wrong. The standardization process for ISLisp started in January 1992, with a WG16 meeting that considered and chose, as a starting point, JIS Kernel Lisp + CLOS. Professor Tournesol (talk) 21:29, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
 * ANSI Common Lisp
 * Eulisp
 * Le_Lisp
 * Scheme
 * DIN Kernel Lisp
 * JIS Kernel Lisp

By contrast, my recollection is that discussion of international Lisp standardization began in 1988 in Paris at the same time as First International Workshop on Lisp Evolution and Standardization (IWoLES) conference in Paris. I mark the date from the header information on my paper, Interactions in Lisp, which was published at that conference. We had arranged conversations about an international standard in a separate venue, taking advantage of the fact that many of us had come to this conference. For all I know, the conference may have been created for that purpose, but it was at least carefully arranged to co-occur at that conference. Richard P. Gabriel was the US International Representative at the time. I later took his place as US Representative. X3J13 was the liaison TAG in the US. It feels like this original 1988 meeting is a better place to date the language from, since ISLISP is borne of politics and the politics go back to then. Wikipedia doesn't want testimonial data, as far as I know, so these accounts of mine probably carry no formal weight. But hopefully they serve to note we need to find appropriate records and/or be very much more precise about what these dates mean. I don't have quick access to contemporary records (though might have some in my house somewhere) in order to peg this any more precisely, but I think 1992 doesn't sound right as a starting point. --Kent Pitman, former Project Editor of ANSI Common Lisp and ISO ISLISP. (Netsettler (talk) 18:16, 6 January 2018 (UTC))

Drop unavailable implementations
I suggest to remove the paragraph about the two unavailable implementations. They are not useful now any more, and they did not influence the history of ISLisp. Professor Tournesol (talk) 23:51, 1 January 2018 (UTC)