Talk:ISO 17025

As all three article are on essentially the same topic it would be very sensible to merge them. As the ISO 17025 is already in Wiki format it would be better to merge the other 2 into this article.
 * Agree. As far as I can tell, the only additional information ISO/IEC 17025 is in regard to the number of accreditation bodies.  I'm going to go ahead and copy this information into ISO 17025. Sagsaw 06:24, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Agree, particularly in light of Sagsaw's copying. Avalon 20:32, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Agree In the light of the merger I'm going to remove the wikify tag from ISO/IEC 17025 as it is currently listed in the "Wikify from August 2006" backlog Madmedea 13:17, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

The correct reference for the document in question is "ISO/IEC 17025", so the title of the merged wiki page should be this, not "ISO 17025".

It would be nice to have a section on what ISO 17025 actually is!

For this to be "correct", the title should read ISO/IEC 17025, as that is the official title. Also should indicate the version history, as they are up to ISO/IEC 17025:2005/Cor 1:2006. See http://www.iso.org/iso/en/CombinedQueryResult.CombinedQueryResult?queryString=17025 Metrologist 15:14, 25 June 2007 (UTC)