Talk:ISO 20022

Controversial wording ????
I would argue that the following wording needs to be reconsidered for the front article

"ISO 20022 is the successor to ISO 15022...."

According to the info at

http://www.iso.org/iso/en/CatalogueDetailPage.CatalogueDetail?CSNUMBER=33179&ICS1=3&ICS2=60&ICS3=&scopelist=

http://www.iso.org/iso/en/CatalogueDetailPage.CatalogueDetail?CSNUMBER=28373&ICS1=3&ICS2=60&ICS3=&scopelist=

the current status of ISO 15022 is not superceded by ISO 20022, rather it was appended by ISO 20022. Otherwise the info at ISO website would be incorrect.

I would reword it as

"ISO 20022 is the standard complementary to ISO 15022"

Or

"ISO 20022 is the appending standard to ISO 15022"

Since I'm unable to obtain these standards, the persons who can access these docs, please verify them.

Not really controversial
Those links indicate that ISO 20022 revises ISO 15022. That revision is so complete that it is correct to consider ISO 20022 to be a successor to ISO 15022.

Note that ISO 20022 has not immediately replaced ISO 15022; both will continue to be in use for years to come, but the intention is that there will be no major new work done on ISO 15022 messages; any major new work will be done in ISO 20022, so ISO 15022 should slowly fade away over time.

Abcoates (talk) 21:28, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Catalogue of Messages
Since its all about the messagings standardisation, I added a reference to the catalogue of messages at iso20022.org. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.49.111.94 (talk) 08:20, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

What does this do???
I've read the summary and I still do not know how ISO 20022 is used or what it is used for. The summary simply states who it is used by (financial institutions) and that it contains metadata and messages. What are in these messages? What does this metadata describe? For this to be a real encyclopeida article, it has to answer "what is this used for". Stephen Charles Thompson (talk) 23:06, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Euroclear link fails?
It does not work from my machine : https://www.euroclear.com/site/publishedFile/ISO_20022_information_note_01102009_tcm91-175221.pdf?title=ISO+20022+-+information+note

Is this link only available if you have a Euroclear account? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.80.22.6 (talk) 17:54, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Does ISO20022 compliance de facto require many banks to use cryptocurrencies?
I saw that Fed Now uses ISO 20022. I heard that 63 central banks announced that they will use ISO 200222, that many financial institutions like SWIFT and DTCC are upgrading to Digital Ledger Technology (DLT), and that there are only 5 DLT tokens that are compliant with ISO 20022. So to be compliant, the Fed and Central banks must use one of these five tokens, including XLM, XDC, Iota, and XRP. They would not use another one because it takes years to develop another token. Does this sound right? Does the Fed and other central banks de facto have to use one of the 5 tokens to be ISO 20022 compliant? Alternately, are there institutions that are ISO 20022 compliant and don't use one of these 5 tokens? Thanks. Rakovsky (talk) 02:02, 6 September 2022 (UTC)