Talk:ISO 259

The transliteration used in the table aren't the same as with the ones provided in the file in the link. --Mahmudmasri (talk) 19:27, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Searching the online catalog at ISO website, I have not found any entry to a standard numbered 259-3. I have added this same comment in Talk:ISO_259-3. Please clarify. PedroLamarao (talk) 14:42, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of ISO_259-3 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ISO_259-3 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/ISO_259-3 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
 * Note: The outcome has implications for this article as well.
 * MisterGoodTime (talk) 22:16, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Self-referential statement
The opening statement in the article says: ISO 259 is a series of international standards ... It is part of a series of standards (ISO 259). Thus the article refers back to itself. Does the statement it is part of a series of standards (ISO 259) come originally from the separate ISO 259-3 article, or is there another series of Hebrew-romanisation standards of which ISO 259 is a member? BobKilcoyne (talk) 03:28, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

The letter <צ, ץ> is /ç/
Here is the source, p. 11. מושא עקיף (talk) 00:45, 18 September 2023 (UTC)