Talk:ISO 8601 usage

Merge?
I think this article should be a part of the main article, not a stand alone. Someone that knows how to do it should append this to the main article and redirect from this articles to the main article.

James thirteen (talk) 13:54, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

I expected a "usage" article to focus on ISO 8601 adoption statistics in various countries, like a more data-based version of Date and time notation by country. I agree that this list of related standards should be merged into the ISO 8601 article and this page should be deleted. --GlenPeterson (talk) 15:40, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

I agree with a merger too. Jason Quinn (talk) 05:03, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

I also agree that the both articles should be merged together. //Sebastian Bergstroem 2012-11-26 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.208.65.4 (talk) 23:43, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

In Your Face
I am bemused that an article about the method and desirability of establishing a worldwide standard format for dates contains within its text such non-8601-compliant expressions as "current third edition published on 3 December 2004" and "the Gregorian calendar of 20 May 1875". Perhaps the authors and editors are fans of irony.