Talk:IUPAC Color Books

This entry should be renamed "IUPAC Color Books". Each Color Book is a book in its own right. Rhinde (talk) 10:36, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Can an experienced editor please indicate whether the use of boldface in the various sections follows Wikipedia's Manual of Style? For instance, in the Green Book section, the phrases "Quantities, Units and Symbols in Physical Chemistry" and "Green Book" are rendered in boldface, but are not synonyms for the title entry. Rhinde (talk) 10:45, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

A merger wiht the general IUPAC artical is not wise, because each of the listed books has a standing of its one in sience. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.150.227.162 (talk) 09:37, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on IUPAC books. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091219183334/http://www.iupac.org/web/ins/2001-043-1-800 to http://www.iupac.org/web/ins/2001-043-1-800

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 13:46, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Color, not colour, books
This article uses the en-gb spelling of "colour". I understand MOS:ENGVAR, and am reluctant to change an article's established variety without good cause. In this case, I think it's necessary because the IUPAC website consistently uses the en-us spelling. A search of the website finds just 3 pages with "colour", none of which refer to the "color books". FWIW, Google searches of the web claim 40,300 hits for "IUPAC" "color book" -wiki but just 163 for "IUPAC" "colour book" -wiki. Despite their strong ties to English publishers and QMUL, they seem to have chosen this variety for themselves, as have others when discussing the "color books", so it seems we should follow. Thoughts? —&#91;  Alan M 1  (talk) &#93;— 11:23, 23 August 2018 (UTC)