Talk:I Do (Lost)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer:  R uby2010   comment!  21:30, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Will review soon.  R uby2010  comment!  21:30, 10 August 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Rationale looks fine
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Rationale looks fine
 * Rationale looks fine


 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments

 * The plot section is a bit overly long and detailed. Try slimming it down
 * Reduced to 670 words.
 * "Kate's marriage, which was first alluded in the season one episode "Outlaws", is meant to be a contrast with her relationship with Sawyer in the realtime events – with Kevin, it is a heartfelt and passionate relationship and Kate tries to get involved but her lifestyle ends up on making the marriage fail, whereas with Sawyer both are afraid of intimacy and connection yet still end up together.[1]" There's quite a lot of "with"s in that sentence
 * Fixed.
 * Make sure sentences with quotations end with citations (mostly in reception section)
 * Is it really necessary? What may seem unreferenced is because the following text is covered by the same source.
 * Yep, it's still necessary in order to fulfill 2b of the GA criteria. In my GA reviews I require that all quoted sentences have citations directly after the period/stop, even if the same reference is already used in the following sentence.  R uby2010   comment!  00:43, 16 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Put one on the only case I found (revolving IGN's review)... or there's more? igordebraga ≠ 01:29, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Weird thing going on ref 12. Make it look like ref 8
 * Done.
 * Ref 10 is BuddyTV, not TV Squad
 * Fixed.
 * Ref 15: LA Times is italicized
 * Fixed.

On hold for seven days while these minor issues get sorted. I also corrected a few other issues myself.  R uby2010  comment!  15:49, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Looks great. Happy to pass this one for GA!  R uby2010   comment!  01:34, 16 August 2011 (UTC)