Talk:I Do Do/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:  Since the suggestions were addressed.
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

I am finished with my part of the review. Awaiting opinion of User:Belovedfreak. --Ishtar456 (talk) 14:04, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I got all the concerns you left, Ishtar. Now, I'll be waiting for Belovedfreak's. -- ThinkBlue   (Hit   BLUE)  22:07, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Reviewer: Beloved  Freak  22:50, 29 June 2010 (UTC) (I will be reviewing with User:Ishtar456.)

Good work ThinkBlue, I'm happy to list this as a GA.-- Beloved Freak  12:57, 2 July 2010 (UTC)