Talk:I Knew You Were Trouble/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Calvin999 (talk · contribs) 16:12, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Note: This should be a quick fail. Nominator is not a main contributor of the article and neither did any work to improve it, just minor edits here and there as evident from here. Also, I'm sure you can see why this article is just not ready like at all. — Indian: BIO  · [ ChitChat  ] 17:15, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I fail to see why not being a main contributor of an article is a problem; I've had other GA nominations where I haven't been a major contributor. Likewise, I am perfectly happy to put in work during the nomination; so a quickfail is entirely unnecessary. Talk:Paul Robinson (footballer born 1979)/GA1 is an example of that. At the very worst, IAR and allow me to work this... Luke no 94  (tell Luke off here) 17:24, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
 * To be honest, I had seen a lot wrong with this article, that is why I chose to review. But as you're not the main contributor, and as IndianBio has mentioned, you have contributed nothing. You say you've nominated other articles that you've had no involvement in, and that is not fair. Because you are claiming the credit for someone elses hard work. To be honest, I think that you should ask me to fail it as a withdrawal, you should then work on it yourself, and then nominate it. Me listing everything that is wrong, which is a lot, is pointless. I might as well as doing everything myself instead of listing it all for you to do. I strongly advise that you ask for this to be withdrawn, which results in a fail, and work on it by yourself first. Look at other GAs, even FAs, to see how music articles should be done. —  AARON  &bull; TALK   22:01, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Fine, withdraw it then. -.- Luke no 94  (tell Luke off here) 08:45, 26 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Failing per nominators decision to withdraw per my suggestion. —  AARON  &bull; TALK   13:30, 26 June 2013 (UTC)