Talk:I Should Have Never Gone Ziplining

Pop cultural references, continuity notes and other details
Please do not add mention of pop cultural references, continuity notes, trivia, or who the targets of a given episode's parody are, without accompanying such material with an inline citation of a reliable, published, secondary source. Adding such material without such sources violates Wikipedia's policies regarding Verifiability, No Original Research, and Synthesis.

While a primary source (such as the episode itself, or a screencap or clip from it at South Park Studios) is acceptable for material that is merely descriptive, such as the synopsis, it is not enough to cite a primary source for material that constitutes an analytic, evaluative or interpretative claims, such as cultural references in works of satire or parody, because in such cases, such claims are being made on the part of the editor. This is called synthesis, which is a form of original research, and is strictly forbidden on Wikipedia, regardless of whether one thinks the meaning of the reference is "obvious". Sources for such claims must be secondary sources in which reliable persons, such as TV critics or reviewers, explicitly mention the reference.

In addition, trivial information that is not salient or relevant enough to be incorporated into the major sections of an article should not be included, per WP:PLOTSUMMARIZE and WP:TRIVIA, and this includes the plot summary. As indicated by WP:TVPLOT, the plot summary is an overview of a work's main events, so avoid any minutiae that is not needed for a reader's understanding of the story's three fundamental elements: plot, characterization and theme. This includes such minutiae as scene-by-scene breakdowns, technical information or detailed explanations of individual gags or lines of dialogue.

If you're new to Wikipedia, please click on the wikilinked policy pages above to familiarize yourself with this site's policies and guidelines.

Plagiarism - Plot Copied from South Park Archives
This plot (original version here, a direct copy of ours) is based on the plot from South Park Archives, which was posted around four hours before it was posted on here (see here). Please give credit where credit is due. You're violating the Wikia's licenses as well as Wikipedia's policy on plagiarism by leaving this uncredited.

Nikolaitttt (talk) 04:21, 26 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Wow, I miss an episode, and one of the other "editors" on the site ends up plagiarizing copyright-protected material for the plot? Wow, I'm shocked. And to think another editor took offense with me when I opined that a good number of the contributors to the South Park articles are lazy. Nope. Not all. Nightscream (talk) 05:04, 26 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Also, the link you posted above doesn't lead to the article on this episode. This link does. Nightscream (talk) 05:27, 26 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I know. I linked to the version history of the plot, to show that it was posted on South Park Archives before it was posted on here. Thanks for fixing this!

Nikolaitttt (talk) 05:57, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Voiceover
The voiceover sounds like the one from Air Crash Investigations.. is it the same guy? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.43.35.143 (talk) 07:47, 21 May 2012 (UTC)