Talk:I did not have sexual relations with that woman

Is this page necessary?
Granted I could learn more about current events, but I haven't come by this "catchphrase" at all. Is this page necessary? And if it is, then shouldn't there be one for Nixon's, "I am not a crook."? I feel this page should be marked for deletion. (Unless there is relevance that I'm not seeing; in that case please ignore my ignorance. o_O) -WarthogDemon 19:38, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

We have pages for a lot of other political catch phrases, see list of political catch phrases. I am not a crook would make a good page too.


 * FYI, as per the merge suggestion, we're discussing the proposed merge at Talk:Lewinsky scandal - so far, three people have replied, all saying we think this article should continue to stand. (And I also think "I am not a crook" could support its own article.) Tvoz | talk 06:42, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that merge suggestion finally closed as consensus not to merge. And, WarthogDemon, I don't know how you never came across this catch phrase. It was huge. But, oh well. Flyer22 01:25, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Popular culture section
Shouldn't the specific episode titles of the TV shows referenced (JAG and Gilmore Girls, respectively) be mentioned? I mean, JAG lasted ten seasons and Gilmore Girls lasted seven. That's a lot of episodes… –Micahbrwn (talk) 00:49, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
 * For anyone who reads this, that section (the popular culture section that was in this article) was removed in early April (April 7th) as "non-notable trivia". Flyer22 (talk) 04:31, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

This page is ridiculous
This page is ridiculous and is further evidence of Wikipedia's extreme right-wing bias. Why, I wonder, isn't there a page for Bush's infamous "Bring 'em on" taunt? (And unlike Clinton's remark, Bush's comment no doubt led to the deaths of a number of U.S. soldiers in Iraq, killed by enraged insurgents inspired by Bush's reckless words).

And how about Larry Craig's "I am not gay, I have never been gay?" That should have a page of its own as well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.99.104.234 (talk) 02:16, 28 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes it probably should - you want to start I am not gay, I have never been gay? – ukexpat (talk) 15:02, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Er, I've never noticed a right-wing bias on Wikipedia...Conservapedia, definitely, but those twats couldn't tell the difference between fact and opinion with the help of a neon sign pointing to each, so...I think you're just taking this a bit too seriously. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.33.59.183 (talk) 22:20, 13 December 2008 (UTC)