Talk:Ian Fleming/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk · contribs) 11:55, 15 December 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Comments

 * No dab links needing attention
 * The image File:30AU emblem.png would seem to have the wrong license and the tag would seem more suitable
 * Done - SchroCat ( ^  •  @ ) 09:44, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
 * This needs rewording as officers are commissioned by the monarch later becoming commissioned by Colin Gubbins
 * Done: SchroCat ( ^ •  @ ) 09:44, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Reuters should be wikilinked on first use
 * Done - SchroCat ( ^  •  @ ) 09:44, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
 * to lure U-boats and German warships towards minefields - are U-boats not German warships ?
 * No – I think a differentiation tends to be made between a warship and a submarine.
 * Its a big jump from the end of the war to living in Jamaica, do we know how he got there and what he was doing inbetween
 * See below for the Personal life and death section
 * Casino Royale was released in the UK in hardcover, priced at 10s, 6d - can a modern price be added for those not aware of what "s" and "d" are.
 * Not that I know of: do you know of a reliable way of "translating" £sd into modern currency?
 * Whats a skiing spy
 * A spy that skis! ;) I've re-worded so it doesn't look so ridiculous! - SchroCat ( ^  •  @ ) 10:22, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Suggest the Personal life and death section comes before the Writing career section as it covers the years before he started writing Bond
 * I see where you're coming from but this would mean his death is covered before his writing career! Would you be happy if I renamed it "1945-1953" (or maybe "post-war life")and used most of the information, except death, which would go into the re-named "Death and Legacy" section? I'll add a few extra bits to cover your concerns above. There would be a minor issue with a couple of bits that fall outside the timeframe (such as his book collecting) but there seems to be no other way of adequately covering it. -  SchroCat ( ^  •  @ ) 10:22, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Consider including the three other books in the table look lost by there selves
 * I did consider it, but with the Bond series sitting alone as the (best-known) bulk of his work, it only leaves three others. They could go together as a section of three, or sub-divided by genre: I went for the split by genre, but I can put those three chronologically if you'd prefer? -  SchroCat ( ^  •  @ ) 10:22, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
 * References include several short cites ( Benson 1988, p. 44.) and long cites (DelFattore, Joan (1989), "Ian Fleming" . In: Benstock & Staley 1989, pp. 85–112) should all be teh same for consistancy
 * Done - SchroCat ( ^  •  @ ) 10:22, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
 * page ranges should be written like ref 12 pp. 85-112 soem have only one 'p'
 * Done - SchroCat ( ^  •  @ ) 10:22, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
 * ref 51 is the only one that has the chapter included
 * Done - SchroCat ( ^  •  @ ) 10:22, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
 * ref 126 cite news  needs formating correctly
 * Done - SchroCat ( ^  •  @ ) 10:22, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
 * What makes RaymondBenson.com. a reliable site
 * Re-cited - SchroCat ( ^  •  @ ) 10:22, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
 * In the Bibliography Amis, Kingsley (1966) needs and ISBN or a OCLC if there was not one issued
 * Done - SchroCat ( ^  •  @ ) 09:44, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
 * same with Fleming, Ian (1963) and Gant, Richard (1966).
 * Done - SchroCat ( ^  •  @ ) 09:44, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The ISBN for Griswold, John (2006) is wrong
 * Done - SchroCat ( ^  •  @ ) 09:44, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Some books need city of publication added
 * Done - SchroCat ( ^  •  @ ) 09:44, 16 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the review. I think I've covered all the points which are all now sorted with the exception of the two questions. If you can let me know how you feel about those, I'll get them written up shortly. Thanks - SchroCat ( ^  •  @ ) 10:22, 16 December 2011 (UTC)


 * How about U-boats and surface ships ?
 * Sounds good: done - SchroCat ( ^  •  @ ) 14:16, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Post-war life sounds good with the split
 * Great: done and I think it looks - and flows - much better now. - SchroCat ( ^  •  @ ) 14:16, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The books stand out not being part of the table, but I am happy with what you decide, it was just presentation.
 * See below - SchroCat ( ^  •  @ ) 14:16, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

On hold
Well done some small points for an article this size. I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow folks to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on. Jim Sweeney (talk) 03:03, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

The other books bit
Hi Jim, Two options on the other books as outlined below. I'm not sure which one I prefer, to be honest! Perhaps the second may do it by a shade for me, but do you have any preference? - SchroCat ( ^  •  @ ) 14:16, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

1964 Chitty Chitty Bang Bang
 * Children's story

1957 The Diamond Smugglers
 * Non-fiction

1963 Thrilling Cities

OR

Other works
1957 The Diamond Smugglers (Non-fiction)

1963 Thrilling Cities (Non-fiction)

1964 Chitty Chitty Bang Bang (Children's story)


 * This one in my opinion. Jim Sweeney (talk) 16:23, 16 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Yeah - looks much better that way. I think I've covered all your points above, but if I've missed any, or if you see any more, please let me know and I'll sort them out straight away. Cheers -  SchroCat ( ^  •  @ ) 18:47, 16 December 2011 (UTC)