Talk:Ian Gibbons (biochemist)

Date convention for the article
As the subject of the article was British, suggest we use UK date convention of Day Month Year. I'm not hugely invested in it either way, but just wanted to give others opportunity for feedback here. Thank you, Princessa Unicorn (talk) 18:22, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

NPOV
I have added the template for NPOV at the top of the article as it is heavily weighted towards the view of Gibbons and against Theranos and Holmes. Aqeccac (talk) 12:05, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Disagree with and object to the ugly tag at the top of the article. User also removed sources without explanation as to why, in edit . Theranos is gone. Therefore, Theranos has no point of view of its own. Holmes was convicted of fraud. The user gives zero explanation as to why they feel there is bias according to their point of view. Princessa Unicorn (talk) 19:22, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
 * , after a careful look at the article I agree with that the article has a neutral point of view. However, I'm concerned about a possible conflict of interest with Rochelle Gibbons.  Mini  apolis  01:31, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your feedback, it's most appreciated. To my knowledge, none of the recent editors to this article have any conflict of interest. All of your input has been most helpful, thank you! Princessa Unicorn (talk) 13:14, 19 March 2023 (UTC)