Talk:Ian Johnson with the Australian cricket team in England in 1948/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

He bowled more overs than anyone but Bill Johnston allowing Bradman to ease the workload on his pace spearheads Ray Lindwall and Keith Miller, allowing them to conserve their energy for the Tests.

Two "allowing"s here. Doesn't sound good.
 * Fixed.  YellowMonkey  ( click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model! ) 07:16, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Is it? The sentence looks the same. Noble Story (talk • contributions)
 * I hope it has now.  YellowMonkey  ( click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model! '') 00:44, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Having been a regular member of the Test team in recent times,[19] and having taken 29 wickets at 12.03 in his four games on tour,[1] Johnson and his spin bowling partner was Colin McCool, a leg spinner, as in the match against Worcestershire.

"Johnson and his spin bowling partner was Colin McCool" is grammatically incorrect.


 * Fixed.  YellowMonkey  ( click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model! ) 07:16, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The sentence hasn't changed.
 * I hope it has now.  YellowMonkey  ( click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model! '') 00:44, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Johnson usually batted at No. 7 or No. 8, although he was notably used as a makeshift opener in the Third Test and scored an aggressive 74 batting at No. 3 in the run-chase against Hampshire.[3][5][7][8][10][13][14][15][16][17][18][22][25][28][40][41][48][49][66][67][68][69][70][74][75][77][78][80][81][82][85][86][87][88]

I would suggest you make one ref, containing all the URLs of these other refs. However, if you can't find a single ref to support this point, is it really all that important?


 * Is that compulsory? Because the refs are already used in different places beforehand and would cause some references to be written out twice??  YellowMonkey  ( click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model! ) 07:16, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * It looks rather bad to have however many references all strung together like that. And as I said, "if you can't find a single ref to support this point, is it really all that important?" Noble Story (talk • contributions)
 * The classic text on the 1948 tour is that by Fingleton and is by far the most comprehensive one out there. However there is no separate text or one that summarises every single player's role individually (while this article and family of articles is about individual contributions ot the tour), which is why there is no data summary all in one piece, about the batting summary of a bowler, which is why I had to piece it together.  YellowMonkey  ( click here to vote for world cycling's #1 model! '') 00:44, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, since the FAC seems to have reached no suitable conclusion, I guess I will let it pass. Noble Story (talk • contributions) 08:03, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Noble Story (talk • contributions) 06:50, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Final Review
I think this now passes all the GA criteria. Noble Story (talk • contributions) 08:03, 20 February 2009 (UTC)