Talk:Iberian nautical sciences, 1400–1600

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: page moved. Standard formatting. Comma vs parentheses is a minor point; will revisit if requested. — kwami (talk) 21:58, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Iberian Nautical Sciences from 1400-1600 → Iberian nautical sciences, 1400–1600 – The present form invites the question "from between 1400 and 1600 to what?"; the capitalization is nonstandard; and the hyphen needs changing to en-dash. I am similarly proposing: —Tamfang (talk) 16:43, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Iberian cartography from 1400-1600 &rarr; Iberian cartography, 1400–1600
 * Iberian ship development from 1400—1600 &rarr; Iberian ship development, 1400–1600
 * Iberian technology in nautical sciences, cartography and ship development from 1400—1600 &rarr; Iberian technology in nautical sciences, cartography and ship development, 1400–1600
 * Support weakly: a marginal improvement in idiom. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 05:07, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Confused – why the RM? Why not just fix them per the MOS?  I support, of course.  Dicklyon (talk) 05:27, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Usually Wikipedia uses parentheses not commas for this, as in History of Ireland (1691–1801). ― A. di M.​plé​dréachtaí 12:03, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

origin
From what was the text copied? —Tamfang (talk) 20:28, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Iberian nautical sciences, 1400–1600. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110808175410/http://library.thinkquest.org/C004706/contents/1stsea/nap/page/n-2.html to http://library.thinkquest.org/C004706/contents/1stsea/nap/page/n-2.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:21, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Complete revision
Althogh it is nice to have an article about the importance of Iberian nautical science, this is full of mistakes and has to be revised fundamentally. It is telling that there is no mention of any of the fundamental works on this topic by Iberian authors (Da Silva, Albuquerque, Cortesao, Bensaude, Barbosa, Da Costa, Canas, Malhao Pereira, Gaspar, Cuesta Domingo, Esteban Piñeiro, Garcia Franco, Laguarda Trias, Lamb, Sandman and many others) As I do not have the time for that I am starting with deleting the paragraph about the Kamal as it has no place at all in Iberian nautical science, the so-called Sagres school and the cross staff. I will bring in more corrections and a set of references later.Wolfgang Köberer (talk) 09:34, 29 December 2021 (UTC)