Talk:Iberian wolf

EN?
in the Portuguese wikipedia it appears as an endangers specie EN__-_-_-__ 16:10, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

History
It reached the region from France, probably from a reintroduced pack. The second part of this sentence is definitely wrong. There is no evidence for wolf releasings in france, neither in the alps or the pyrenees. Everything speaks of a natural immigration. See also the latest official reports of wolf status in France: http://www.oncfs.gouv.fr/events/point_faune/mammifere/loup.php I will change this in the article. --77.239.33.183 (talk) 23:34, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

This has only been suggested as a new subspecies. It is not recognized as such by current taxonomy.
This article is out of line with the current taxonomy, it seems. Look at this page, http://www.bucknell.edu/MSW3/browse.asp?id=14000738. There is no mention here of "C.l.singatus", and just because one expert publishes a paper saying that this is a separate subspecies from Canis lupus lupus, doesn't mean we at wikipedia should go ahead and create a taxobox for the article and write in the lead that it is, in fact, a separate subspecies. We would have chaos on Wikipedia if we followed that, as experts are forever suggesting changes to the taxonomy in papers and we as Wikipedians (whatever we are in real life) cannot be the judge of such matters. They go through proper channels; the International Society of Mammalogists or whatever study all the published papers and then elect someone to write it up with careful peer review in an official volume such as Mammal Species of the World. Then we at Wikipedia can report such things as "Canis lupus suchandsuchus is a subspecies of Gray Wolf." I will hold off for some comment for some time, but then I will be removing the taxobox and re-writing the lead and any relevent parts to reflect this. Chrisrus (talk) 16:22, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Iberian wolf. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131113080933/http://www.quesabesde.com/noticias/lobos-caza-espana-picos-de-europa_11102 to http://www.quesabesde.com/noticias/lobos-caza-espana-picos-de-europa_11102
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131113082146/http://www.ptjornal.com/2013110819149/pt-animal/noticias/lobo-iberico-dez-organizacoes-exigem-protecao-fiscalizacao-e-punicoes-exemplares.html to http://www.ptjornal.com/2013110819149/pt-animal/noticias/lobo-iberico-dez-organizacoes-exigem-protecao-fiscalizacao-e-punicoes-exemplares.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 16:21, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Hola!
I have added a link to a copy of Cabera A, 1907 Los lobos de Espana. Perhaps a fluent Spanish speaker might have a look at pages 193-198 - especially the last few pages - to held distinguish these wolves for the article. (I fear that my attempt with the use of a language translator does not pick up the nuances of the language as it was spoken over a century ago.)

Additionally, I have concerns about where the distribution map came from and how accurate it is. William Harris •  (talk) •  22:34, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Subspecies
On Wikipedia, the authority for what is a recognised mammal species is MSW3, as can be found at WikiProject Mammals. This has been directed by the WikiProject Tree of Life under the subsection Mammals. New editors may not be aware of this. Wikipedia must maintain a standard if it is to be accepted as a proper encyclopedia, and MSW3 is that standard. GENBANK is not a taxonomic authority, as is stated on the GENBANK website (and yes, I am the editor that placed the GENBANK reference into the article). Finding obscure claims of subspecies is not acceptable. I maintain an entire list of questionable Canis lupus taxons over at Subspecies of Canis lupus. Until MSW4 is released, signatus will need to wait and see what it holds.

Additionally, the Izquierdo reference for the claim of "Spanish wolf" will require a page number if it is a book or a weblink if it is an article (I can assist with the formatting if you can locate it). The zoopark weblink will be acceptable for this article while it is at quality=C level but will be removed should the article improve in quality (that will be done by some other editor and not by me).

If you are a Spanish speaker and would like to add to this article in a more constructive manner, perhaps you might assist with my request directly above this section - what description makes this wolf different. William Harris •  (talk) •  21:29, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Map please
A colour-blind-accessible map portraying the regional information in the Distribution and conservation section would be really helpful. (Presumably monochrome would be good enough to show where the Iberian wolf is present.) Frans Fowler (talk) 18:41, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Andalusia
If my understanding is right, it has recently been reported that this wolf is now extinct in Andalusia.https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/aug/01/wolves-declared-extinct-in-andalucia-spain-aoe At present the WP article mentions neither its presence nor its extinction there. Perhaps someone with a firmer grasp of wolf subspecies than I have could update the article, if appropriate. Frans Fowler (talk) 19:00, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - FA23 - Sect 202 - Thu
— Assignment last updated by SUpercool2154 (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2023 (UTC)