Talk:Ichigo Kurosaki/Archive 2

Abilities
This is the first time I've made a new section, and I don't have an account, so I hope someone doesn't just delete this. I don't think it makes sense that Ichigo has no abilities section. He only has the creation and concepts and appearances, while others, such as Yasutora (Chad) have sections about the plot outline for him, appearance, and abilities. Doesn't it seem that Ichigo should have an ability section? Other major soul reapers have sections that explain their zanpakuto, it's shikai, it's ablities, and it's bankai. We know Ichigo's shikai, bankai, special ability, and even his Hollow Self. Shouldn't these things have something better than a small mention in his Appearance section? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.4.125.116 (talk) 22:28, 26 February 2010 (UTC)


 * See Manual of Style (anime- and manga-related articles); "for personality and other aspects that require reader/viewer interpretation, reviewer/critical/academic comments are strongly desired."Tintor2 (talk) 01:38, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Arrancar Zangetsu?
Shouldn't the article, where it talks about Zangetsu's appearance, mention his "Tensa" form and that he can merge with the inner Hollow to become an arrancar-like being? At one point I saw that it did mention Zangetsu's Tensa form, but it was reverted. 75.157.120.15 (talk) 19:31, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Ichi's Forms
The latest (and apparently last) chapter has an opening picture of all of Ichigo's forms: human, sealed Zanpakuto, shikai Zanpakuto, bankai Zanpakuto, Visored, and Hollow 2.0; running together, with the foot of his next metamorphosis vanishing off the edge of the page. I suggest we include this image to show how the character has changed and developed over the course of the series. 173.180.64.146 (talk) 09:26, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Ichi's New Hollow Form
Shouldn't something be mentioned about Ichigo's new Hollow form? You know, the one he assumes after Ulquiorra Schiffer blows a hole in his chest with his Cero Oscuro. The mask is very different from Ichigo's normal Hollow mask, and its body shape is different than the one he took transforming into a complete Hollow while training with the Vizard (horns, no tail, no shoulder spikes). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.157.84.228 (talk) 01:40, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

oh this was not put by this person but in my personal opinion and that of my friend this is not per say a new "hollow form' but ichigo's "ARRANCAR form" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.106.242.146 (talk) 03:56, 14 May 2009 (UTC)


 * That's WP:OR and we should refrain from putting it. DaisukeVulgar (talk) 09:41, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Actually it shouldn't be included at all til a legit english translation of that manga or episode exists...which won't be for a while!--Licourtrix (talk) 16:53, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Besides, Arrancar have broken masks. The mask Ichigo wore when he killed Ulquiorra was whole, not broken. 142.26.194.190 (talk) 14:48, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
 * His mask changed again. 142.26.194.190 (talk) 14:53, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

this sould be known as ichigos espada form —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.191.180.11 (talk) 18:08, 10 June 2010 (UTC)


 * The espada are the top ten Arrancar in Aizen's service. Arrancar, as stated above, have broken masks.  Ergo, it is not "ichigos espada form".  It has been confirmed that that form was Ichigo's new Hollow form. Leave it at that.  207.216.208.68 (talk) 21:16, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Mugetsu
Ichigo is no longer a Soul Reaper. While it hasn't been confirmed that Aizen is dead, it has been confirmed that in using the Final Getsuga Tensho, or "Mugetsu", Ichigo has lost his Soul Reaper powers. Though he could always use the Hogyoku to ractivate them, as happened to his father, that is up to Tite Kubo to Deicide. We should add that he has sacrificed his abilities to destroy Aizen. 207.216.208.68 (talk) 02:30, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Fullbringer
Who added "Fullbuster" under the species category? Fullbring (NOT Fullbust) is a type of power, not a species. I am going to remove it. 173.180.89.129 (talk) 01:58, 18 February 2011 (UTC)