Talk:Ichthyornis dispar

The article says:


 * Marsh named several species. Although only one, I. victor, is currently recognized...

If I. victor is the only recognized species, then why the name of this article is Ichthyornis dispar? Or is there other recognized species in this genera? Either way, this article should be moved to Ichthyornis. As the introduction suggests, this article is about the genus.--Jyril 15:30, 16 October 2005 (UTC)


 * I am in agreement that this article needs to be combined with Ichthyornis, especially considering that paleontologists currently recognize I. dispar (not I. victor) as the only valid species of the genus.--Nar&#39;eth 19:27, 2 June 2006 (UTC)