Talk:Ida Braiman

POV issues.
Most detailed cites describe a situation where stone-throwing strikers were attempting to intimidate non-striking workers and their employer, at a site which was also the employer's home, with several (non-striking) workers injured by objects thrown at them through the windows of their workplace. A grand jury accepted Sauter's claim of self-defense. Does the article reflect this? Anmccaff (talk) 19:39, 25 January 2018 (UTC)


 * I've added a sentence that includes the reports of stone-throwing from the crowd. Catemcc (talk) 20:39, 25 January 2018 (UTC)


 * ...written from a POV, rather than from sources. Are there -any- decent sources that dispute that the mob was pressuring univolved workes?  Any that dispute that potentially lethal objects were thrown at the workforce? Anmccaff (talk) 20:44, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

"Lady, Chicken?"
r.i.l. Anmccaff (talk) 19:52, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

I think this source should be reinstated, if corrected in its citation (an error in the automatic citation generator that I hadn't fixed) -- it is a 1971 item in a feminist journal that mentions the press reprinting posters of the 1913 document. Catemcc (talk) 20:26, 25 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Leaving aside the over-citing issue for a moment...why? What do you feel that mention in a very, very, little little magazine is cite-worthy? Anmccaff (talk) 20:42, 25 January 2018 (UTC)