Talk:Idaenam

Pressian
It seems a lot of English Wikipedia articles dealing with South Korea use Pressian which is a very biased source (and questionable, in my opinion, like NewDaily, Polinews, MediaWatch. MediaToday, and OhMyNews. (BTW, OhMyNews can be pretty much written by anybody, so it's not a product of professional journalism.) I'd prefer if the articles are sourced to the following: Chosun Ilbo, Donga Ilbo, Joongang Ilbo, Hankyoreh, Kyunghyang Shinmun, YTN, Hankook Ilbo, Yonhap News, KBS, MBC, SBS, TBS, MBN, or perhaps a local newspaper like Seoul Shinmun or Gyeong-in Ilbo. Also, I wish they are not misrepresented or used for an ideological purpose. For example this quote from this article "Some Idaenams think that men in their 20s who do not discriminate against women are becoming victims of reverse discrimination by affirmative action (for women) led by older male feminists." This is not only biased, but nowhere did the article linked talk like that. It talked about Idaenam, gender quotas and reverse dicrimination, but nothing of any desire to "discriminate" by young men.

Most of these sources in the article are outsider sources (NYT, Economist). The Korean sources used here is Pressian, Chosun-Ilbo, and Joongang Ilbo. Pressian is mainly used here. Chosun Ilbo was used in this manner: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research#Synthesis_of_published_material. It could do better if articles were used mainly from the sources listed above.

Also, seriously, calling Park Geun-hye's [conservative] government a "regime" is misrepresenting things The definition is actually "administration." (https://korean.dict.naver.com/koendict/#/entry/koen/e472295edbc34a439797a7ac3684cf82). --User:Theophilus Andronicus (talk) 19:20, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Gender and Politics in Global Perspective
— Assignment last updated by A.lejla (talk) 19:19, 4 May 2023 (UTC)