Talk:Idylease Inn

refinement needed
The article's intro claims this is "The only surviving example of resort facilities", seeming to mean that this is the only resort surviving in the world. That would be an overly broad, false claim. Is it meant to claim that a surviving building on the site is the only building on the site that survives from the the larger site's early days as a resort? doncram (talk) 10:55, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

The UNESCO World Heritage Site information needs to be removed, as it is false. Idylease currently is not and never has been a World Heritage Site. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.58.229.163 (talk) 18:33, 12 November 2009 (UTC)