Talk:Iguana Girl/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Link20XX (talk · contribs) 20:09, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

I'm going to review this one too. Link20XX (talk) 20:09, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

I have completed my initial review. Just needs a few things before it can be promoted:

Checklist

 * 1) Is it well written?
 * A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
 * B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
 * 1) Is it verifiable with no original research?
 * A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
 * B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons&mdash;science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
 * C. It contains no original research:
 * D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
 * B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Comments
Lede and infobox: Production: Reception:
 * The genres in the infobox need to be sourced.
 * Done.
 * something about this sentence doesn't make sense, maybe add "she" or "Hagio" after the comma.
 * Revised.
 * The Anime News Network article on Fantagraphics' licensing of the series doesn't say they released it in 2010 specifically, just that they licensed it
 * Additional soruce added.
 * In source 21 and 22, Natasha, Inc needs to be tagged as the publisher to Comic Natalie. Source 22 also needs to be tagged as a Japanese language source.
 * Done.

That is all. Address them and I will pass it. Link20XX (talk) 21:07, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Response above. Morgan695 (talk) 22:10, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Changes are sufficient. I have promoted the article and closed this review as Pass. Congratulations! Link20XX (talk) 22:20, 19 May 2021 (UTC)