Talk:Ikara (missile)

Off-target
Ikara had double the range of ASROC, ASROC's flight time was 55s max, & the Mk44's max detection range 457m. How does this bear on the ability of Ikara to hit, exactly? It's very unclear. And the diagram showing ASROC PK is no help... TREKphiler  hit me ♠  19:08, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Double the range of ASROC?
The article says that Ikara has a range of 10 nm and is double that of ASROC. But the ASROC article says that it has a range of 15 nm. What's the story here?--Dwane E Anderson (talk) 14:45, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Ikara (missile). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110519014645/http://naa12.naa.gov.au/scripts.ItemDetail.asp?M=0&B=930305 to http://naa12.naa.gov.au/scripts.ItemDetail.asp?M=0&B=930305

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 17:30, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Ikara (missile). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070824043608/http://www.middle-watch.co.uk/Ikara.htm to http://www.middle-watch.co.uk/Ikara.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060517174400/http://www.adastra.adastron.com/projects/ikara.htm to http://www.adastra.adastron.com/projects/ikara.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070216054009/http://www.skomer.u-net.com/projects/ikara.htm to http://www.skomer.u-net.com/projects/ikara.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070105035856/http://web.ukonline.co.uk/aj.cashmore/.weapons/australia/.asw.html to http://web.ukonline.co.uk/aj.cashmore/.weapons/australia/.asw.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070827225820/http://www.probertencyclopaedia.com/cgi-bin/xphrase.pl?keyword=malafon to http://www.probertencyclopaedia.com/cgi-bin/xphrase.pl?keyword=malafon
 * Added tag to https://fas.org/man/dod-1-1/sys/missile/vla.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061014232429/http://destroyers.org/Ord-Articles/ASROC.htm to http://www.destroyers.org/Ord-Articles/ASROC.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 22:32, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Hawker Siddeley Ikara?
Can anyone comment on why Commons has this categorised as Hawker Siddeley Ikara? Trawling throught the convoluted history of 1960s British aerospace mergers is always tricky, but did Hawker Siddeley really have that significant an involvement to appear in the naming like this? Andy Dingley (talk) 12:29, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
 * There is an Ikara missile on display in the RAF Museum Cosford. Its surrounding explanatory material describes it as the “Hawker Siddeley Ikara, Ship-launched anti-submarine missile”. There is no mention of Ikara’s Australian origins. At Government Aircraft Factories (an Australian entity) the Ikara is claimed as one of GAF’s products.
 * The likely explanation is that, by the end of the RN’s association with Ikara, Hawker Siddeley was the interfacing entity between the Australian supplier and the UK Ministry of Defence. It is also likely that Hawker Siddeley and/or its predecessor was responsible for installing and maintaining the ship-board system in RN ships equipped with Ikara. Dolphin ( t ) 10:47, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
 * My comment was spurred by visiting Cosford and uploading some photos of its Ikara to Commons.
 * I wouldn't trust the information boards at Cosford though. Some of them are just a bit of 1980s anti-peacenik sarcasm, but many have really quite glaring howlers on them. Their caption of the "Hawker Siddeley"(sic) Firestreak emphasises the need for it to obtain a "radar lock" before launch. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:56, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
 * A heat-seeking missile that requires a radar lock! Now that’s a hybrid. Dolphin ( t ) 11:09, 23 June 2019 (UTC)