Talk:Il Cuore nel Pozzo

Dignano
I wrote that Dignano is not in Istria and removed the claim that it was an established Italian settlement in the interior of Istria. However it seems there are two Dignano's&mdash;one in Italy (province of Udine), see this link; another one is Vodnjan/Dignano, in Croatia. However, the location (as in this map) is hardly "in the interior", it is just 10 km from Pola and about 5 from the coastline.

Fair use rationale for Image:Il cuore nel pozzo poster.jpg
Image:Il cuore nel pozzo poster.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 02:22, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
 * This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
 * There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
 * It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
 * In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 22:33, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

poor English
A real shame that such a sensitive and difficult topic is presented in awkwardly unidiomatic English, which sometimes makes the text difficult to follow - e.g. 'It has been told that....', 'collected poor critics' - 'critics' are people, not comments!213.127.210.95 (talk) 16:25, 10 December 2015 (UTC)213.127.210.95 (talk) 16:19, 10 December 2015 (UTC)