Talk:Ilaria Ramelli

Awards
(from the Humboldt Foundation, the European Commission, the President of the Italian Republic, the Institute for Philosophical Studies, Universities, and scholarly foundations), for example, two Agostino Gemelli Prizes, the Marcello Gigante Classics International Award; a Marie Curie Award, the "Prix Auguste Pavie", and a Forschungspreis from the Humboldt Foundation (2017),

as well as nominations for the Goodwin Award of Merit (SCS), the G.Henkel Prize, the Holberg Prize, the AAR Award, and endowed chairs at major universities.

She sits on numerous directive and advisory boards of academic series and journals, from Brill (for the series Ancient Philosophy and Religion ),

SBL Press (for the series Writings from the Greco-Roman World ), Routledge – Taylor and Francis for the Journal of Early Christian History, Akropolis: Journal of Hellenic Studies, Eirene: Studia Graeca et Latina from the Czech Academy of Science, Member of the Scientific Board of the Series, Studies in Early Christianity and Patristics; member of the steering committee of the SBL section, Religious Competition in Late Antiquity; and other publishers.

This is not a CV
This article keeps getting edited to resemble a CV, resume, or LinkedIn page. At what point can a page become semi-protected from these edits? Ilaria Ramelli has written a number of books. Perhaps the person who keeps adding seemingly every place Ramelli has worked instead could spend some time list those books and other publications with relevant information (dates, ISBNs, publishers, and link any coauthors who are on Wikipedia).--DiamondRemley39 (talk) 19:37, 7 April 2019 (UTC)


 * It is not a list of published works either. only those that received substantial coverage by independent reliable sources to establish notability should be included. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 22:46, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I think it is a possibly paid editors at work. The original cut was promotional. It has that kind of focus, every where she has been, its really important, list it in the article, attitude.  I think an uninvolved editor is needed to update article, either that or page protection will be needed for the next week or two, until the edit storm dies down.   scope_creep Talk  23:20, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I think there are enough uninvolved experienced editors watching the article, so I agree with proposal for protection. Semi-protection should be enough, as I don't think full protection would be justified at this time.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 05:46, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I have to disagree with these constaints. The Manual of Style section on Lists of Works (MOS:WORKS) specifically says "The individual items in the list do not have to be sufficiently notable to merit their own separate articles. Complete lists of works, appropriately sourced to reliable scholarship, are encouraged..." Being complete, and following the MoS, is not promotional. --Gronk Oz (talk) 16:56, 24 May 2019 (UTC)