Talk:Illustrated manuscript

POV tag
I have added the tag because the article has been created to promote a personal and eccentric POV by User:Dbachmann, who believes that manuscripts illustrated with pictures do not count as Illuminated manuscripts, which he thinks should only be those "decorated" (a term he has not defined) as opposed to illustated. This is completely contrary to all standard usage - for him the Tres Riches Heures, possibly the most famous illuminated manuscript, is "illustrated". The article should be merged with illuminated manuscript, with some of the material that is not already there added. Johnbod 18:21, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * eccentric, huh? I cited the definition of "illuminated" per OED. You have not cited anything. We can continue this discussion when you have found some source, alright? dab (𒁳) 21:17, 25 February 2007 (UTC)


 * See below Johnbod 15:57, 26 February 2007 (UTC)