Talk:Ilyushin Il-112

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Ilyushin Il-112. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
 * Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.ilyushin.org/products/cargo/112t.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 09:56, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Checked the source, it is working. Scotteaton92 (talk) 15:44, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Translated titles
I recently made [an edit] which added details to some citations. It would be nice if someone proficient in Russian would check the translated titles. Scotteaton92 (talk) 15:52, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Wing Area?
The "Wing Area" in the Specs is shown as 300m² which is about 4x the area of any similar aircraft. It implies a chord of about 10m (30ft). Seems a bit extreme - is anybody able to confirm the wing dimensions? Santamoly (talk) 00:16, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:51, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Ilyushin Il-112 first prototype.jpg

Behind the times
The article states that "the first flight of the developmental aircraft of the Il-112 will be around the middle of 2017". But it's now 5 years later, and the aircraft is in production and being flown about the place to airshows, etc. Perhaps the article can be fixed up to bring it into the present? Santamoly (talk) 03:29, 2 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia is a work in progress - you are welcome to update the article if you have reliable sources. MilborneOne (talk) 11:16, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
 * The article is more up to date than the original comment implies - the latest stuff is in the Operational History section - currently the article is a little disjointed, but it probably needs to indicate the large slippages in the programme and the weight problems.Nigel Ish (talk) 21:28, 3 July 2021 (UTC)