Talk:Ilyushin Il-32/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Grondemar (talk · contribs) 00:29, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

This is a very simple article, with therefore very little to review. I do have a couple of concerns regarding the need for citations and the infobox image:


 * Opening sentence: "The Ilyushin Il-32 was a Soviet heavy military glider developed after World War II to deliver 7,000 kg (15,000 lb) of cargo, including 60 troops or a 122 mm (4.8 in) cannon with its prime mover, ammunition and crew." I know the 60 troops are mentioned in the specifications, but nowhere else in the article is the cannon mentioned.  It should be discussed in the body, with a citation.
 * The specifications need a citation.
 * The licensing of the image File:Il32-i.jpg needs to be improved; it certainly wasn't taken in 2004. The file either needs to be shown to be PD, or a fair-use rationale needs to be provided.
 * Note that I have tagged the image for deletion at Commons, but I have saved a copy locally to be re-uploaded at en.wp with a FUR if necessary. –Grondemar 00:59, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
 * All done, image transferred to en.wiki.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:23, 26 December 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * This review is placed on holdfor a minimum of seven days pending resolution of the above concerns.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * This review is placed on holdfor a minimum of seven days pending resolution of the above concerns.
 * This review is placed on holdfor a minimum of seven days pending resolution of the above concerns.

Thanks. –Grondemar 00:50, 23 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks for addressing my concerns above. I will now  pass this article as a Good Article.  Congratulations! –Grondemar 23:56, 26 December 2011 (UTC)