Talk:Image analysis

Untitled
Merging Image Analysis and Computer Image Analysis makes perfect sense to me. But Digital Image Analysis may be a better title.

better use Image Analysis (commonly used in literature) and merge with existing "image analysis" article

Merge them and consider enriched merge guidelines.
Given that both pages are small, merger looks wise to me. The proposal to merge the more specific - "Computer Image Analysis" - into the more general "Image Analysis" also seems right. I found no guidance in the 'Style Manual' or the 'Merge' page. If I wasn't looking in the right place, please tell me user:randy.f. "Computer" vs. "Digital" is a narrower issue. I slightly prefer "Digital" here because some of the less sophisticated IA tasks can be done with something less than a computer. "Learning" on the hand still requires something more than a computer.

These pages are both general and small. There are much more detailed specific pages on suptopics. The single merged IA page should provide an overview to these more specific pages. At the moment, someone who wants an overview would not get it here. They could try looking at the subtopic pages, but would probably be lost in the mountain of detail. Wikipedia should try to be an altas to the world of knowledge. A page is a chart. Charts can vary in detail and scope. And they can overlap.

--Randy.f 21:46, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Urgent need for expansion
I totally agree with Randy.f. This article is in urgent need for expansion. I'll do it myself when I get some time; I hope others do it as well. Also, there is a confusion in several Widipedia articles, where the editors equate processing with analysis; these are different things. I'll look for appropriate sources for editing this.Renato (talk) 18:24, 18 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi guys, I added some descriptions and examples of different techniques in image analysis as well as different applications of image analysis, to get the article looking more complete :-) Shervinemami (talk) 18:37, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Spam
Aren't almost all these external links advertisement/spamm?Are they ok or do they violate a wikipedia policy?Renato (talk) 23:15, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Some proposed changes
Kindly add the below as a reference* here "Techniques-->Medical Scan Analysis [*]" https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20172792 Hidasri (talk) 08:29, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
 * ❌ - please state how this will improve the article.   Dr Strauss   talk   21:34, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Analyser une image
Analyser 2C0F:F038:654:1800:0:0:0:3 (talk) 19:08, 25 January 2024 (UTC)