Talk:Imamate in Shia doctrine

List/Table
Shouldn't we have a list that covers all Imams and branches from Ali to people accepted by present-day communities as Imam (like the Aga Khans. Something like the table below from my suggestion at Talk:Caliph:

PLEASE: I know the facts below are not yet right; these are placeholders.

I removed the claim that the Prophet Muhammad had always insisted that Ali was his sucessor and changed it to a more neutral claim that Shias believe that he listed Ali as his sucessor due to the incident at Ghadhir Khom. I believe whoever edited it before was a Shia, and including such information removes neutrality from the article, in my mind at least.

DigiBullet 20:11, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)

assalam walaykum, i have just got a question for you muslims out there weith islamic teachings how would i come to terms with a muslim being a freemaosn

email me at sassysam92@hotmail.co.uk —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.111.13.35 (talk • contribs)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Imamah (Shia). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080329020223/http://www.balagh.net/english/shia/shia/10.htm to http://www.balagh.net/english/shia/shia/10.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080618012237/http://www.ummah.net/khoei/imam.htm to http://www.ummah.net/khoei/imam.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041025093409/http://philtar.ucsm.ac.uk/encyclopedia/islam/shia/index.html to http://philtar.ucsm.ac.uk/encyclopedia/islam/shia/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:44, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Consolidation of reference sections
Greetings and felicitations. Among other things, I just consolidated two of the reference sections. If you have comments or concerns, please let me know. —DocWatson42 (talk) 04:29, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Requested move 1 July 2019

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) —  Newslinger   talk   09:16, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

– Currently we have four inconsistently titled articles: these three and Imamate in Nizari doctrine. I am proposing following the latter format because (a) the existing dab page is at imamate and this appears to be more common than imamah per Google ngrams and (b) "in X doctrine" is clear about what the articles are: a treatment about the general concept in a specific doctrinal tradition. I most concerned about consistency and could go another way on imamate/imamah or the method of disambiguation/description. Srnec (talk) 15:06, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Imamah (Shia) → Imamate in Shia doctrine
 * Imamate (Twelver doctrine) → Imamate in Twelver doctrine
 * Imamah (Ismaili doctrine) → Imamate in Ismaili doctrine


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.