Talk:Imbrex and tegula

GA Thoughts
This article could use another copy edit: it has sentence fragments ("Consequently, when they were employed in the construction of the greatest temples, such as that of Jupiter at Olympia[3], the Parthenon at Athens, and the Serapeium at Puteoli."), and a large number of very difficult to understand passages, such as "Tiles were originally made perfectly flat, or with nothing more than the hook or nozzle underneath the upper border, which fulfilled the purpose of fixing them upon the rafters. They were afterwards formed with a raised border on each side. In order that the lower edge of any tile might overlap the upper edge of that which came next below it, its two sides were made to converge downwards." - this is extremely hard to follow, and it's hard to quite see what the "raised border" section is used for - is it to hold the imbrex in place?

In short, I'm afraid the article is too poorly organised and not well-written enough to be of GA quality yet. Still, it's clearly well-researched, so it's probably not too far off. HAve another go at it then resubmit! Adam Cuerden talk 07:30, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Questions about the uses of these roofing tiles
I was reviewing the article since it's listed on the good article review list, and I'm wondering about a few things. The answers to these questions might give a little more depth to the article:


 * 1) Were the imbrices and tegulae used on ordinary people's homes, or just on the homes of the well-to-do, or just on public buildings?
 * 2) Was any sort of waterproofing used in the joints, so water couldn't seep in?  I know they didn't have silicone sealer back in those days, but maybe they put pitch, tar, or mortar in the joints.
 * 3) Some kind of labeling in the image would be useful to point out the parts.

I wouldn't fail the article on its GA nomination just on these criteria, but I think it would be useful to add a little more background on their use. --Elkman - (Elkspeak) 20:12, 28 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Done. Thanks for the suggestions!  &mdash; Catherine\talk 07:56, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

GA promotion
Nicely done! I have one suggestion. Although the article is short so that it does not really need a lead section, it would be better to have one anyway (perhaps one paragraph length). This is to keep with the style of the rest of Wikipedia. RelHistBuff 13:37, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Concerns with GA status
After stumbling across this article, I've notice a few things that would typically keep the article from GA status. 2 of the 7 paragraphs are unreferenced. The article seems awfully short - perhaps a Examples of use section might be good with some images of buildings that use the technique, or maybe a Evolution section (hopefully better named) detailing the changes in Imbrex/Tegula roofing throughout history. In fact, the article could use some sections in the first place. Also the references should be more consistent in style. I'd recommend using citation templates for that. Lastly, the images are really big, and take up much to much space in comparison to the text. Hopefully someone can take care of these, otherwise I'll ask for a GA Review soon. Drewcifer3000 18:56, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Good Article review
Since noone seems to be coming to the rescue of the article, I've nominated this article for Good Article review, which could result in a delisting of the article from GA status. Anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Drewcifer 04:35, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 * After some improvements were made, the result of the review was Keep. An archive of the discussion can be found here. Drewcifer 21:16, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Chinese tiles
There are Chinese tiles similar to these that should be included in the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.171.149.155 (talk) 03:46, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Imbrex and tegula. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050213035835/http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/ to http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050213035835/http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/ to http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/cgi-bin/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 17:07, 16 July 2016 (UTC)