Talk:Imlek a.d.

Requested move 22:54, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the proposal was not moved. --BDD (talk) 20:08, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Imlek (company) → Imlek – There is nothing else called Imlek in English Wikipedia, so the disambiguation part "(company)" is not needed. Imlek already redirects here. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:54, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Survey

 * Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with  or  , then sign your comment with  . Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.


 * Oppose a Wikipedia search shows the predominance of the previous use of "Imlek" before it was changed to point to this company earlier this year. A google search  also does not show that the company is more prominent than the Indonesian celebration. Google Images  only comes up with the Indonesian version of Chinese New Years. Therefore, the previous redirect should be restored. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 04:53, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Oppose: The company is not the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, according to quick google searches. The company does not form the majority of entries using the term. --  李博杰  &#124; —Talk contribs email 10:36, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Oppose 300 for Imlek "new year", however a dab may be a good idea. Not sure if the Indonesian New Year still meets WP:PRIMARYTOPIC as this is Serbia's largest dairy company. In ictu oculi (talk) 02:04, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Discussion

 * Any additional comments:


 * Comment only started pointing here earlier this year. For 3 years, it pointed at a different topic all together. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 04:40, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment I have WP:BOLDly disambiguated the target page pending the resolution of this. Either it should point to the Chinese New Years article, or this article should replace it, but in the meanwhile, a disambiguation page should sit there until it's decided. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 04:55, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment: OK. I have no problem with this arrangement with Imlek being a disambiguation page. I support that. I just thought that a situation where Imlek was redirecting to this article was odd. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:01, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
 * If Imlek redirects to Chinese New Year, its use in that context should at least be mentioned there. Peter&#160;James (talk) 19:58, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Reference added. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 01:23, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Imlek a.d.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130916002011/http://www.imlek.rs/en/imlek-regional-dairy to http://www.imlek.rs/en/imlek-regional-dairy
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131202224032/http://www.imlek.rs/en/history to http://www.imlek.rs/en/history

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 07:05, 12 November 2017 (UTC)