Talk:Immutable characteristic

"Correctable"
I would like to remove the word "correctable", as this uncharitably restricts the point of view to which it is being ascribed. Speaking for myself, I view sexual orientation (more precisely, sexual activity which conforms to a presumptive sexual orientation) as a behavior, but I would not necessarily characterize it as "correctable". Obviously, there's a lot to argue about here, which is not my intention. But "correctable" there diminishes a point of view unnecessarily, which may not be the most NPOV representation. Haakondahl (talk) 11:06, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Delete this article
It has no sources. Just a couple of links to other WP article, none of which substantiate what is said here. Several of the protected groups are not immutable. Being a hate crime has little to do with anything being immutable. I say delete the article as worthless. Roger (talk) 03:04, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Toussaint and Roscelese are both known LGBT types. This stupid article should be deleted immediately. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.77.22.9 (talk) 12:27, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Physical
If immutable characteristics are, as per the definition provided in this article, limited only to physical attributes, then how can there be any debate over whether sexual orientation is covered?