Talk:Impella

Point of view
The article sort of reads like an advertisement, doesn't it? Fantumphool (talk) 03:55, 12 September 2016 (UTC)


 * I tried to edit from my own article (Which was a good source, however, the editor JYTDOG didnt like it since it was a COI case. So lets wait and watch, if we can see some info on Impella. IMO, try to find articles on PubMed rather than here. MedTime  ( talk ) 05:41, 8 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Threw in my two cents. A one piece floating magnet is a gem if it could steer valvular flow.


 * It does read like an ad, which is evident from the structure of the page itself. There isn't as much useful medical information here as one would hope, instead reading like something written to attract investors. Separate sections for Indications, Contraindications, and Complications might be nice (the closely-related IABP page, here, is more information-dense and may be an interesting comparison - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intra-aortic_balloon_pump). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.46.250.158 (talk) 04:24, 13 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Agree it does read like an ad, therefore few sections are now updated according to the recent evidence from PubMed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.51.253.171 (talk) 12:17, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Manufacturer's Web page
The manufacturer's web page is: https://www.protectedpci.com/impella/ A direct link to this site may be a helpful addition to the article. Thanks Lbeaumont (talk) 22:16, 31 January 2019 (UTC)