Talk:Imperial Gift/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Tomandjerry211 (talk · contribs) 11:01, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Discussion
Hi User:Tomandjerry211, thanks for taking on this review. I have addressed the issues you have pointed out as follows: Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 12:19, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 1a
 * The article is from the March 2003 edition of the SA Flyer, a monthly magazine, removing the month would break the citation. However the source is actually not cited in the article so I have removed it from the Bibliography. If you think it should be put in a "Further reading" list I could do so, and also with any other Bibliography entries that are not actually cited.
 * The redundant citation in the lead has been removed.
 * Which external link is broken? The article is already a few years old so linkrot may indeed be a problem.
 * I think the link works now,--Tomandjerry211 (Let's have a chat) 12:21, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 1b
 * Overlinking fixed.
 * Passing, Well done.--Tomandjerry211 (Let's have a chat) 12:21, 1 July 2015 (UTC)


 * @Tomandjerry211 - Thanks, that was surprisingly easy! I have gone ahead with moving uncited Bibliography items to "Further reading". Will you complete the promotion or is there another process to go through? Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 12:43, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
 * It's all ✅. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 13:47, 1 July 2015 (UTC)