Talk:Implantation failure

Why says it has to be defined as "inheret" failure?
Would you mind explaining where and by who there is a consensus that "implantation failure" can not include intentional failure to implant? Because I can not gind any source state that it has to happen "naturally" to be "implantation failure". ★Trekker (talk) 23:14, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
 * The whole concept when talking of failure in implantation is of the failure of the embryo to implant in the uterus; the unsuccessful progress of implantation and its inevitable state of non-pregnancy. Can you find a medically reliable source for your wanted inclusion of Intentional failure to implant? There are many reliable sources that state that medically, implantation is the first stage of pregnancy. It may be that any material unrelated to this might be better presented on pages dealing with contraception.--Iztwoz (talk) 08:46, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
 * That definition does not exclude intentional prevention, as such I feel it is up to you to prove that intentional is excluded.★Trekker (talk) 10:03, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
 * User:StarTrekker - Firstly it is not up to anyone else to prove an exclusion - it is up to the editor to prove by citing a medically reliable source that intentional prevention is included. Secondly can you put right the wrong info in first sentence that you made, before it is removed.  Thirdly since you are so uninformed of the subject what exactly is your interest?  Fourthly when you copy material from a page you need to give proper attribution else it may be removed. Thank you --Iztwoz (talk) 17:02, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I don't think I need to explain/justify interest in anything. Also, I wrote "expanding with information from main article" in the edit summary, the implication there is very obvious and I doubt anyone would have a hard time understanding it.★Trekker (talk) 17:56, 25 April 2023 (UTC)