Talk:Implicit carbon prices

Too technical and hard to understand
For example the first paragraph mentions fuel taxes against local pollution but surely if you are against local pollution you are going to impose Low-emission zones in urban areas rather than a fuel tax which also covers rural areas.

Also later about fossil fuel subsidies it says ‘The removal of these subsidies through reform are a positive implicit carbon price.’ but that does not make sense to me as surely removal of the subsidies results in a higher carbon price but it could still be zero not positive.

I don't understand why the short description is 'Indirect costs of climate change measures'.

And what are 'tradable performance standards'? Chidgk1 (talk) 18:46, 12 January 2024 (UTC)