Talk:Impossible Is Nothing (Iggy Azalea song)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Azealia911 (talk · contribs) 11:14, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Review to come soon, looks good!  Azealia 911  talk  11:14, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you, looking forward!  Cool Marc  12:14, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

General

 * Some MoS:DASH violations in reference titles.
 * I'm not sure what / where these violations are. Please could you specify. Thanks.  Cool Marc  06:39, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Fixed them for you  Azealia 911  talk
 * Thanks so much  Cool  Marc  08:20, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Infobox and lead

 * For the writer field, changes Azalea's credit to an unlinked 'Azalea'
 * ❌ I think you might be confusing Template:Infobox single with Template:Track listing?  Cool Marc  07:01, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm not confusing them, it just seems unnecessary to use a linked version of her full name when its already listed in the infobox.  Azealia 911  talk
 * Per WP:OLINK links may be repeated for reader understanding and accessibility reasons, unlike prose and track listings the Infobox should be as clear and accessible as possible.  Cool Marc  08:34, 3 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Remove the "Recorded" field altogether, it can be listed in a less crowded way in the credits section
 * ❌ Template:Infobox single encourages this parameter. Two studios are not "crowded" either.  Cool Marc  07:01, 3 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Unlink the following: 'beat', 'percussion instrument', 'chimes', 'glockenspiel', 'empowerment', 'underdog'.
 * ✅  Cool Marc  07:01, 3 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Why is there a sentence talking about a tour that the song was not a part of? Same with Reclassified? That strikes me as really odd.
 * It was a promo single for the album that was ironically not included in the reissue nor ever performed live by Azalea. It's interesting facts about the song's aftermath and not odd in my opinion. The reader would not know this without this sentence.  Cool Marc  07:01, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
 * If you really want to include it, fine, but you need better sources. The ones provided don't justify the claim, they mention nothing about the song not being included on the tour/album. Especially in the case of the tour review, she could have just not performed the song on that particular date, hence it not being mentioned and the claim then constituting WP:OR and WP:SYNTH.  Azealia 911  talk
 * Will remove it then...  Cool Marc  08:37, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Background and release

 * Unlink Iggy Azalea, interpolation and pre-order
 * I haven't unlinked Iggy Azalea per WP:OLINK, but have unlinked the other two.  Cool Marc  07:07, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Composition

 * Add "that runs for a duration of three minutes and ten seconds" to the end of "hip hop song"
 * ❌ There's nothing key or important about it being the length of a typical popular song, the length was not spoken of by third party sources.  Cool Marc  07:12, 3 October 2015 (UTC)


 * What does "sparkle-like" mean?
 * Removed.  Cool Marc  07:12, 3 October 2015 (UTC)


 * "Aspirational in its lyrics" needs rewording
 * ✅  Cool Marc  07:12, 3 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The Quietus should be in italics
 * ✅  Cool Marc  07:12, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Critical reception

 * "named it a highlight" → "deemed it a highlight"
 * ✅  Cool Marc  07:15, 3 October 2015 (UTC)


 * PopMatters should be in italics
 * ✅  Cool Marc  07:15, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Track listing

 * I'd advise removing this section altogether, it's quite redundant. A track listing should generally only be used at a very minimum if there are at least two tracks in a single (EG. an explicit and clean version of the same song), just one track shouldn't really require one.
 * ✅  Cool Marc  07:16, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Credits and personnel

 * Move the reference sentence to the opening of the section.
 * ❌ sections/sentences are referenced at the end and not the beginning.  Cool Marc  07:24, 3 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Like I said in my comments of the infobox, move the recording studio information here.
 * ❌ I personally don't think a studio location equates to personnel. I've already mentioned this in the prose as well.  Cool Marc  07:24, 3 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Link the first appearance of the relevant positions, EG.
 * I found this to be unnecessary. They are very basic terms that have been linked in the prose where necessary.  Cool Marc  07:24, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Charts

 * Add  to the table
 * ❌ there are no two chart types to distinguish it from. Hence redundant.  Cool Marc  07:26, 3 October 2015 (UTC)