Talk:Imprimis

Limbaugh quote
The trancript from which the Limbaugh quote was taken shows quite clearly that it is an in-show ad. As such, it appears to present something of a conflict, and I support its replacement with one that didn't come from advertising copy. Can anyone find a reliable, third party source that describes Limbaugh's support for the publication? What do others feel about the removal of this quote? Steamroller Assault (talk) 22:58, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm a little mixed. I guess it could be an ad (at least, it starts with a Hillsdale student and ends with an ad), but Limbaugh himself has appeared in Imprimis in January 2009, and I don't think it's that outlandish for him to say that he supports it.  But you're right, finding a better source would be preferable.  I'll see if I can find something from National Review or the Wall Street Journal, something that has a conservative bent inclined to express support. --Abidjan227 (talk) 23:14, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Imprimis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090223193718/http://media.www.hillsdalecollegian.com/media/storage/paper1270/news/2008/04/10/News/Imprimus-3316940.shtml to http://media.www.hillsdalecollegian.com/media/storage/paper1270/news/2008/04/10/News/Imprimus-3316940.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:25, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Misleading title
It is wrong that a derived secondary use of this word is the subject of this article. It needs a stub on the primary significance Jezza (talk) 08:36, 15 June 2020 (UTC)