Talk:Inès de Bourgoing/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 09:57, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Thanks looking forward to you improvement suggestions. SusunW (talk) 15:42, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Will review later this evening!♦ Dr. Blofeld  14:18, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Sorry for the delay, I've been flat out with the contest. Very little to complain about:


 * Link any places not already linked in Fez, Kenitra, Marrakech, Meknes, Mogador, Oujda, Rabat, Safi and Taza.
 * ✅ SusunW (talk) 17:28, 16 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Link château de Thorey-Lyautey, presumably there should be an article on the chateau itself  might be able to create that one!♦  Dr. Blofeld  10:05, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I linked to the article on French WP. Is that sufficient, or must we create the article? SusunW (talk) 17:40, 16 October 2016 (UTC)


 * "Not only had she cared for wounded soldiers, she had turned to the weak and the poor without any concern for race, gender or faith" -watch tone here, promotes her a little too much as a heroine.
 * Revised the language to be more neutral. SusunW (talk) 17:48, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

"Colonel Pierre Geoffroy, a close associate of the Lyauteys"?
 * "Colonel Pierre Geoffroy who enjoyed close associations with the Lyauteys," -
 * ✅ SusunW (talk) 17:48, 16 October 2016 (UTC)


 * "On 7 July 2002, on the 140th anniversary of her birth, a small area on the first floor of the Château de Thorey-Lyautey was opened by Senator Philippe de Bourgoing and Count Pierre de Bourgoing in memory of Inès de Bourgoing. It contains photographs and other historical artefacts in a building which is otherwise dedicated to the life of her husband Hubert Lyautey.[24]" -she hasn't died yet LOL, why is this before death? Move to "Death and legacy" section
 * Moved.--Ipigott (talk) 14:42, 16 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Thanks very much for the review I think I have addressed your concerns. Advise if we need to do anything further. SusunW (talk) 17:48, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Sorry for the delay. A OK.!

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: ♦ Dr. Blofeld  19:34, 17 October 2016 (UTC)