Talk:In-image advertising

It's legit! Really!
This article is in the editing phase. It should not be deleted because it has substantial sources, including a scholarly article and an article from the New York Times, and is written with a neutral tone.

To the participants in the long-running edit war on this article
Please stop the long-running revert war on this article. I have semi-protected the article itself, so the if you want to edit it, you will need to register a Wikipedia account first. Instead of merely reversing one another's changes, please discuss any changes to that page here, so that consensus can be achieved according to Wikipedia's editing rules. -- The Anome (talk) 18:36, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Rationale for "In-image advertising" revert
My research on in-image advertising led to a TechCrunch article indicating it was GumGum, not Picad Media, that created the first in-image ads in February of 2008. The TechCrunch article cited in relation to Picad Media creating the first in-image ads states the company launched in September, 2008. If these facts are inaccurate or there is another reason for reverting my entry, please explain. Thank you. (Tonywinders (talk) 03:42, 5 September 2012 (UTC))